There’s enough to fix roads, bridges

Article Image Alt Text

    It should not come as a surprise to anyone that Colorado has one of the fastest-growing economies and fastest-growing populations in the nation.
    Yet, for a state surging in economic development, the state government has spent a fraction of what’s needed on the roads and bridges that service this influx of commerce and people.
    For nearly a decade, transportation funding has been hyper-politicized, and the subject of a perennial blame-game between Republicans and Democrats. This begs the question: If both sides know more spending on roads and bridges is needed, why the impasse?
    The issue is a fundamental disagreement about how Colorado spends your tax dollars. Colorado has a constitutional mandate to balance its budget; every dollar collected must be accounted for in the annual budget. Democrats continue to look for more revenue, regardless of how much more money we get per year. Conversely, Republicans have long argued the problem is not the amount of revenue but how it’s prioritized.
    Take for example Gov. John Hickenlooper’s recent budget request. Nowhere in his $30.5 billion 2018-2019 budget proposal is any general fund money allocated for roads and bridges. This is also not surprising, as none of his previous budget requests have called for general fund spending on these critical projects. It should be noted that during his administration, general fund revenue outpaced population by four to one.

The full article is available in our e-Edition. Click here to subscribe.

EDITOR’S NOTE: Jon Becker represents Phillips County in the Colorado House. This article was co-written by him and Perry Buck, R-Windsor; Terri Carver, R-Colorado Springs; Polly Lawrence, R-Roxborough Park; Paul Lundeen, R-Monument; Dan Nordberg, R-Colorado Springs; and Yeulin Willett, R-Grand Junction.

Holyoke Enterprise

970-854-2811 (Phone)

130 N Interocean Ave
PO Box 297
Holyoke CO 80734